Looks like text messages take longer to comprehend than send
Item TypeConference Presentation
MetadataShow full item record
Keeble and Hazel (2004 Perception 33 Supplement, 152) have assessed the extent to which punc- tuation can influence reading speed; but how does word construction itself influence the time taken to read prose? In particular, does the style of abbreviated text routinely composed by `texters' influence subsequent reading speed, and does lifetime exposure to texting affect time taken to read text passages? We recorded passage-reading speeds (N 32) for two different social groups of people: students (mean age: 21 years; range: 19 ^ 24 years) and academic staff (mean age: 45 years; range: 33 ^ 64 years). Students acquired their first mobile phone under the age of 20 (mean acquisition age: 14 years; range: 12 ^ 16 years), whilst academic staff acquired their first mobile phone over the age of 30 (mean acquisition age: 37 years; range: 30 ^ 54 years). The prediction was that the latter group would be less able to adjust to the language of abbreviated text messaging, and consequently require longer to read a passage composed in this manner. Reading speed was assessed for each of four short (250 word) passages of text composed either in Standard English, contractions, phonological approximations, or a mixture of approximation and contractions. Identical target words (N 45) were used in each passage but each passage comprised a different narrative, thanks to variation of target word order. Reading for meaning was ensured by means of post-reading comprehension test. Across the experiment, each passage served in each condition in a counterbalanced within-subjects design. Reading speeds were faster for unadulterated text than for all abbreviated passage types. Results demonstrate the deleterious effects of `txt' abbreviations on reading speed; however, the difficultly found in reading text does not appear to vary across the two populations sampled: no significant differences were found between academic staff and students.
Mayberry, L. and Scott-Brown, K.C. 2009. Looks like text messages take longer to comprehend than send. Applied Vision Association Annual 2009 Meeting, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK, 31 March 2009, Abstracts. Perception. 38(4): p.627. Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/ava09am