Abertay Research Collections >
Dundee Business School >
Dundee Business School Collection >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10373/129

View Statistics
Title: The legitimacy of pay and performance comparisons: An analysis of UK University Vice Chancellors pay awards
Authors: Tarbert, Heather
Tee, Kaihong
Watson, Robert
Affiliation: University of Abertay Dundee. Dundee Business School
Keywords: Vice Chancellors (VC) pay awards
External pay benchmarks
Issue Date: 4-Dec-2008
Publisher: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Type: Article
Refereed: peer-reviewed
Rights: The definitive version of this article is available at http://www3.interscience.wiley.com
Citation: Tarbert, H., Tee, K. and Watson, R. 2008. The legitimacy of pay and performance comparisons: An analysis of UK University Vice Chancellors pay awards. British Journal of Industrial Relations 46(4): 771-805
Abstract: This article examines UK University Vice Chancellors (VC) pay awards. The empirical analysis, covering the period 1997–2002, evaluates the impact upon VC pay awards of university performance measures, internal pay comparisons and two external pay comparisons, that is, the pay of other VCs and the pay of chief executive officers (CEOs) leading comparable-sized UK firms. For the total sample, we find no evidence that VC pay awards are related to any of the performance measures, although for the pre- and post-1992 subsamples there is some evidence that pay awards are related to some ‘mission-relevant’ performance measures. All the analyses show a positive relationship between changes in the proportion of other highly paid employees and VC pay awards, which suggests that internal pay comparisons play an important role in remuneration committee decision making. As anticipated, the two external pay benchmarks have very different effects upon VC pay awards; the pay received by other VCs produces a marked ‘mean reversion’ in pay levels while the pay of CEOs running comparable-sized UK firms had a highly significant positive impact upon VC pay awards. Following the insights of institutional theory, we interpret this conservatism by university remuneration committees as stemming primarily from legitimation concerns rather than financial constraints.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10373/129
Appears in Collections:Dundee Business School Collection

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.


Valid XHTML 1.0! DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2010  Duraspace - Feedback