Logo
 

Abertay Research Collections >
Social & Health Sciences >
Social & Health Sciences Collection >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10373/244

View Statistics
Title: Weighing up the evidence: a qualitative analysis of how person-centred counsellors evaluate the effectiveness of their practice
Authors: Daniel, Tom
McLeod, John
Affiliation: University of Abertay Dundee. School of Social and Health Sciences
Keywords: Counsellors
Evaluation
Outcome
Person-centred
Issue Date: Dec-2006
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Type: Journal Article
Refereed: peer-reviewed
Rights: Published version (c)Taylor & Francis, available from DOI: 10.1080/14733140601024762
Citation: Daniel, T. and McLeod, J. 2006. Weighing up the evidence: a qualitative analysis of how person-centred counsellors evaluate the effectiveness of their practice. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research. 6(4): pp.244-249. [Online] Available from: DOI: 10.1080/14733140601024762
Abstract: Research into the effectiveness of counselling and psychotherapy has great practical significance, as a means of collecting evidence that may potentially enhance the quality of services delivered to users. In recent years, the evidence base for counselling and psychotherapy has increasingly relied on data derived from self-report questionnaires completed by clients, with relatively little attention being paid to therapists' evaluations of outcomes. To make full use of therapist estimates of outcome, it is important to develop an understanding of the processes and criteria that therapists employ when making such judgements. However, little is known about the evaluation strategies used by therapists in their everyday practice. The aim of the present study was to explore the implicit and informal construction of outcome evaluation by experienced practitioners. Person-centred therapists were interviewed about their approach to evaluation. The interview data were analysed using a grounded theory approach. These practitioners reported that they engaged in a process of evaluation based on a range of different sources of evidence, which was then “weighed up”. Evaluation was a continuous activity that was embedded in the counselling process itself rather than arising from discrete measurements carried out at particular times. The findings of this study suggest that practitioners may possess a sensitivity to the complexity of outcome that is missing in much current research. Implications for training, research and practice are discussed.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10373/244
ISSN: 1473-3145
Appears in Collections:Social & Health Sciences Collection

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2010  Duraspace - Feedback