Finding the way forward for forensic science in the US: a commentary on the PCAST report
Item TypeJournal Article
MetadataShow full item record
A recent report by the US President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST)  has made a number of recommendations for the future development of forensic science. Whereas we all agree that there is much need for change, we find that the PCAST report recommendations are founded on serious misunderstandings. We explain the traditional forensic paradigms of match and identification and the more recent foundation of the logical approach to evidence evaluation. This forms the groundwork for exposing many sources of confusion in the PCAST report. We explain how the notion of treating the scientist as a black box and the assignment of evidential weight through error rates is overly restrictive and misconceived. Our own view sees inferential logic, the development of calibrated knowledge and understanding of scientists as the core of the advance of the profession.
Evett, I.W., et al. 2017. Finding the way forward for forensic science in the US: a commentary on the PCAST report. Forensic Science International. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.06.018
RightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
This is the accepted manuscript © 2017, Elsevier, which is embargoed until 26th June 2018 to comply with the publisher's self-archiving policy.
The following license files are associated with this item: