Abertay Research Collections >
Social & Health Sciences >
Social & Health Sciences Collection >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||Do we need to rethink guidance on repeated interviews?|
|Authors: ||La Rooy, David J.|
Malloy, Lindsay C.
Lamb, Michael E.
|Affiliation: ||University of Abertay Dundee. School of Social and Health Sciences|
|Keywords: ||Repeated interviews|
Child sexual abuse
|Issue Date: ||Nov-2010|
|Publisher: ||American Psychological Association|
|Type: ||Journal Article|
|Rights: ||This is the author's final version of this article. Published version (c)American Psychological Association, available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0019909. This article may not exactly replicate the final version published in the APA journal. It is not the copy of record.|
|Citation: ||La Rooy, D., et al. 2010. Do we need to rethink guidance on repeated interviews? Psychology, Public Policy and Law. 16(4): pp.373-392. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0019909|
|Abstract: ||Within the legal system, children are frequently interviewed about their experiences more than once, with different information elicited in different interviews. The presumed positive and negative effects of multiple interviewing have generated debate and controversy within the legal system and among researchers. Some commentators emphasise that repeated interviews foster inaccurate recall and are inherently suggestive, whereas others emphasise the benefits of allowing witnesses more than one opportunity to recall information. In this article we briefly review the literature on repeated interviewing before presenting a series of cases highlighting what happens when children are interviewed more than once for various reasons. We conclude that, when interviewers follow internationally recognised best-practice guidelines emphasising open-questions and free memory recall, alleged victims of abuse should be interviewed more than once to ensure that more complete accounts are obtained. Implications for current legal guidelines concerning repeated interviewing are discussed.|
|Appears in Collections:||Social & Health Sciences Collection|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.