Abertay Research Collections >
Social & Health Sciences >
Social & Health Sciences Collection >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||When eyewitnesses talk|
|Authors: ||Wright, Daniel B.|
Skagerberg, Elin M.
|Affiliation: ||University of Abertay Dundee. School of Social & Health Sciences|
|Keywords: ||Memory conformity|
|Issue Date: ||Jun-2009|
|Publisher: ||SAGE Publications|
|Type: ||Journal Article|
|Rights: ||Published version (c)SAGE Publications, Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01631.x|
|Citation: ||Wright, D.B., et al. 2009. When eyewitnesses talk. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 18(3): pp.174-178. Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01631.x|
|Abstract: ||When two people witness an event, they often discuss it. Because memory is not perfect, sometimes this discussion includes errors. One person's errors can become part of another person's account, and this proliferation of error can lead to miscarriages of justice. In this article, we describe the social and cognitive processes involved. Research shows how people combine information about their own memory with other people's memories based on factors such as confidence, perceived expertise, and the social cost of disagreeing with other people. We describe the implications of this research for eyewitness testimony.|
|Appears in Collections:||Social & Health Sciences Collection|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.