Logo
 

Abertay Research Collections >
School of Science, Engineering & Technology >
Science Engineering & Technology Collection >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10373/981

View Statistics
Title: A cost comparison of traditional drainage and SUDS in Scotland
Authors: Duffy, A.
Jefferies, Christopher
Blackwood, David J.
Waddell, G.
Shanks, G.
Watkins, A.
Affiliation: University of Abertay Dundee. School of Contemporary Sciences
Keywords: Capital costs
Operation and maintenance costs
SUDS
Traditional drainage
Whole life costs
Issue Date: 2008
Publisher: IWA Publishing
Type: Journal Article
Refereed: peer-reviewed
Rights: Published version (c)IWA Publishing, available from http://dx.doi.org/10.2166/wst.2008.262
Citation: Duffy, A., et al. 2008. A cost comparison of traditional drainage and SUDS in Scotland. Water Science and Technology. 57(9): pp.1451-1459. Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.2166/wst.2008.262
Abstract: The Dunfermline Eastern Expansion (DEX) is a 350 ha mixed development which commenced in 1996. Downstream water quality and flooding issues necessitated a holistic approach to drainage planning and the site has become a European showcase for the application of Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems (SUDS). However, there is minimal data available regarding the real costs of operating and maintaining SUDS to ensure they continue to perform as per their design function. This remains one of the primary barriers to the uptake and adoption of SUDS. This paper reports on what is understood to be the only study in the UK where actual costs of constructing and maintaining SUDS have been compared to an equivalent traditional drainage solution. To compare SUDS costs with traditional drainage, capital and maintenance costs of underground storage chambers of analogous storage volumes were estimated. A whole life costing methodology was then applied to data gathered. The main objective was to produce a reliable and robust cost comparison between SUDS and traditional drainage. The cost analysis is supportive of SUDS and indicates that well designed and maintained SUDS are more cost effective to construct, and cost less to maintain than traditional drainage solutions which are unable to meet the environmental requirements of current legislation.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10373/981
Appears in Collections:Science Engineering & Technology Collection

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2010  Duraspace - Feedback